25/08/2010 by admin.

I constantly tell my two children that life is one long learning curve and that most days I pick up some new knowledge which gives me value in terms of business or maybe just basic survival. In our education process, we are taught, for the most part by those that have had little or no significant  firsthand knowledge of the culture of the world of business. There are two ways round this, we either make 6-12 months work experience part of the graduate teaching programme, or we bring in appropriately prepared business people into the schools as part of the basic operation. The latter is partly a process under way in an ad hoc basis in a variety of schools. Unfortunately it largely requires the goodwill of business on a voluntary basis. That may not sit too well in the current economic climate.

I have tremendous sympathy for the world of education, like us in business, Government cannot seem to stop tinkering. Like us in business, the burden of regulation seems to grow rather than diminish. Having spent many hundreds of hours working in schools with students delivering thousands of hours of enterprise learning, I am quite sure I have a feel for the problem What a pity nobody takes the time out to listen and to engage.

What I have little sympathy for are those that always bleat on that the examination process is being “dummed down” and that it is easier to pass exams. Again, from experience, observing my two children and talking to their friends, I absolutely disagree. Maybe I only have the experience of Grammar School students, but certainly the last two years of my daughter’s education has seen her studying many late nights and on weekends – wrapped round volunteering with The Police and a part time job in  a major store. She tells me that there were no easy bits in her work and that she felt “challenged” with the exams. So who is right? From that she is part of the 8.1% gaining A* status. Good news for one Kent University!

The questions grows in the business community as to the value of a degree. It has been  said before that they are as common as the A level. We must ensure that only appropriate degrees are given that status, some of the courses frankly do not deserve that title, we have to find some differentiator. I believe in the growing movement towards apprenticeships, that is where many of the so called degree courses should be repositioned. My company had the benefit of an international graduate for three months. Why is it that in France they can do a degree course in two years? Is this another part of the bloated system we have here in the UK, should the spare year be used for work experience as part of the education programme?

Business is on the lookout for people that can add value to an operation. It is the ability to bring value to the employee base, not necessarily immediately, but to demonstrate the promise to get there. We still have a problem with numeracy and literacy – again why is that? How have we addressed that problem? Where has the stimulus been to get it right on all sides? Why has there been no improvement, after all there are a large number of well paid people out there responsible for delivering it.

Posted in Education | Print | No Comments »

11/08/2010 by admin.

I make no apologies for the fact that I may appear to be occasionally cynical. It stems from a well deserved right based on my age, thirty years self employment and having spent ten years lobbying, standing up for the rights of small businesses to survive.

It is a healthy cynicism, indeed it is a collaborative and entirely supportive approach in attempting to understand just what is going on in the world of politics with its new thinking and sweeping away of old orders to bring in the new. If I put a question that is mildly challenging, just as I would throw a stone into a pond, I see the ripples as a radar system for measuring the answer, and if, as one of my old tutors told me, attack is the best form of defence, I use that to judge the substance of response.

Having spent many hundreds of hours over the last ten years sitting in consultation with government as a business representative and  having driven hundreds of miles to those meetings, to see initiative after initiative literally thrown away or replaced by the latest adaptation, I believe that may be the root of some of my cynical tendencies. The work we did in the Regional Assembly, an interesting but costly experiment in collaboration created by the democratically elected – now merely dismissed as unwanted regionalism. The South East Plan, the spatial strategies, the myriad of consultative groups on education, skills, business support, broadband provision, infrastructure and the rest all binned. And where has it got us?

Local Enterprise Partnerships. Now it’s Localism, the latest and most urgent task upon which to dwell, something that the latest government has created and the latest in a long line of thought provoking tests of thinking, seeking the appropriate solution for us to build the latest round of initiatives on. Am I cynical? Yes. Am I hopeful, will I put in yet more hours in collaboration and in workshops and responses? Yes. All across the country our FSB colleagues are gathering a head of steam working on this new opportunity. Many of the reports coming back indicate a complete disarray amongst the local authorities and a very varied approach to the inclusion of business.

This time, we have a Prime Minister that has clearly set out, albeit a sketchy agenda for a brave new world of collaboration focused on the explicit value of the business community. The cynic shouts out that government has not thought anything through and has been too quick to dismantle old structures. The pragmatist comes through helpfully pointing out that we may need a little more pain to build something bold and solid.

The Kent Economic Board (KEB) met to examine the LEP potential. The questions were put – fundamentally what is it we need? We already know those answers, nothing has changed over the last 12 months other than the country is a great deal poorer, what we have to find now is the way of generating a solution which ultimately includes bidding for part of a pot of money Government is putting up. The end goal is greater profitability and stability of the business sector generating growth, jobs and a strong return to the Exchequer’s coffers.

We have had the benefit of the KEB and the Kent Partnership for a number of years that has enabled the county to bring together a diverse group to discuss the county’s needs and aspirations. Everything is in place for the creation of the LEP. Compared to the situation many of my FSB colleagues find themselves in around the country, we are streets ahead and should applaud that fact. What is different this time is the suggestion from Government that the LEP be equal business and political in its composition and it suggests that business will have the ability to make decisions and expect a reasonable level of implementation. The test will be for the democratically elected to work within that scenario. After all there is a partnership already in existence – business creates the wealth – they spend it.

Posted in Uncategorised | Print | No Comments »

11/08/2010 by admin.

Let’s just assume for the moment we were running a plc, call it GB Enterprises if you like. The southern patch of the sales area has been generating most of the business and innovation that funds the rest of the business. It has been doing that for some time and really shows no sign of discontinuing its value to the business as a whole. However, the other sales reps are getting a bit peeved because we have been investing in the south, but they sure as hell don’t mind benefitting from the income that the other bit delivers for them.

Now we have a new Managing Director and Board and they are scared of the regional sales teams so what they have decided to do is not just stop investing heavily in supporting the productive part of the business, they are positively going to discriminate against it making it more expensive and less encouraging to begin new projects and deliver new products.

Just to add a fly into the ointment, the shareholders now want a greater say in the decision making process, as those that provide the funding for the capital that drives the company forward, the problem is – the management really don’t want to let them have a vote on anything.

Sound at all familiar? What London School of Economics or Harvard Business School guru would use that as an example of good business management? But there again I am just a simple micro business owner, what do I know?

The South East England Federation of Small Businesses has expressed anger and disappointment that the Budget announced by Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Osborne discriminates against potential new small businesses in the South East.

There is no doubt that National Insurance Contributions are a tax on jobs which hit small businesses particularly hard and the FSB has campaigned strongly against the proposed increase as it is clearly a tax on jobs.

That means the plans to exempt new firms from paying up to £5,000 a year in NIC for taking on up to 10 new staff is a move the FSB welcomes but where the plan goes wrong is by excluding businesses in the Greater South East from this scheme.

The Chancellor rightly claims that in those Regions, which include London, South East and East of England, many private sector jobs have been created in the last 10 years but that should not mean that we are now penalised because of that success.

This aspect of the Budget clearly discriminates against businesses in the South East and undermines the Chancellor’s claim that this is a ‘fair’ budget.

The FSB wishes to see this NIC exemption applied across the whole country and we urge the Chancellor to think again on the discriminatory nature of his current plans.

The FSB represents more than 213,000 business people across the United Kingdom with around 40,000 in the southeast, and is the largest single organisation representing business interests in the country. However, working together with colleagues from the other key employer organisations under the banner of the Southeast Business Forum (SEBUS), we are in direct dialogue with government, reinforcing the messages that are rapidly building a picture of deep discontent and concern. Time for the Managing Director and his Board to listen very carefully.

Posted in Uncategorised | Print | No Comments »

11/08/2010 by admin.

So there we have it, fresh, bright optimistic words from the new Prime Minister in his speech on 5^th May. Words that we have believed should be the defacto status of a true democracy. Whether a local politician, an MP or an MEP or government official at any level, the word is out on the street, the guidelines are set, the people have spoken.

Now we need to see who is listening. The cold hard facts are that we are in a serious position, money will be tight, tax will be higher. The question we must now constantly ask, is – is it fair, is it sensible, will it build or destroy. What we must not lose sight of is the fact that the small business sector has a critical role to play in the underlying structure of the economy and must be nurtured. Take away the ability to invest, the ability to employ, the feeling of confidence and the entrepreneurial risk taking, then this economy and the country will not meet the prosperity targets it needs to set for itself for global survival.

The FSB is pleased that coalition negotiators have listened to the business community and plan to reverse the proposed one per cent increase in NICs for employers. A healthy increase in personal tax thresholds is something that FSB has been urging for some time. This will not only provide more disposable income for the lowest paid workers, but will also encourage businesses to take on more staff. From our point of view, the inclusion of the Lib Dems is an interesting one as they lifted much of the content of our own manifesto – typos as well and incorporated it in their own.

Reading through the Coalition programme for government there are some quite clear promises that are being made. The fact that it is spelt out that “Government believes that business is the driver of economic growth and innovation” is hardly surprising, but we are all agog as to how they will set out to deal with the issues.  The regulatory burden reduction is top of the list it seems and yes, with that approach business may begin to get a breath of air into the working week and have more time to concentrate on the job in hand – growth. The promise to “support the creation of Local Enterprise Partnerships – joint local authority business bodies to promote local economic development” seems a little like closing the gate after the horse has bolted, Kent surely has a good precedent in the Economic Board, however with a new slant and some empowerment as suggested by the paper, it could be rebuilt to replace the Regional Development Agency activities.

It is critically a time where politicians have had their cards marked, and are under a microscope, now is the time, as evidenced by the start of this unique coalition, to set aside old ways of thinking, political dogma and to stand up and think of Britain and deliver promises.

There are some great, hardworking people out there in the public sector and local government with whom the FSB are working with and applauding through the FSB Accord initiative and I know that my colleagues in business and in the FSB will do their best to play a role in our economic recovery, it needs to be a joint effort – call it a coalition if you will.

Posted in Uncategorised | Print | No Comments »